Ratigan Capital / personal proprietary lab

Financial freedom through a repeatable process,
not promises.

Free lessons and untested playbooks are open now. Verified results and a deeper journal will be published only after they meet the research standard (target: January 1, 2027). Crypto-focused. No signals. No made-up numbers.

Financial freedom is something to learn toward, not something promised. “AI-driven” here means proposed research assistance, not operating trading bots. No verified P&L is published yet.

  • Risk accepted before the click
  • Each trade is one outcome in a series
  • Losses stay in the record
  • Evidence before results
System architectureDesign map · not live telemetry

Select a stage, or follow a trade through the system. This walkthrough is illustrative — not a live trade, a signal, or a result.

01 / Evidence

Available

Data and research intake

Research pages are published · no live data feed

Start with a question and inspect the source, including what is uncertain or missing, before a rule is treated as a finding. This is the data and research intake for the lab—not a market signal.

The architecture of a repeatable process. Tools available today and proposed automation are labeled separately. This map is a design diagram, not live telemetry and not a performance chart. The candlesticks and traced line are an illustrative path, not market prices and not a result.
PUBLIC BUILD / PRE-RESULTSRead the evidence standard →

How to use this site

A recommended starting path.

Free lessons and untested playbooks are open now. Verified results are not. Begin with risk, then the formula, then the rules, then the publication standard.

Josh waving hello beside two small teal candlesticks and a winding ice-blue path.

Learn with Josh

A beginner path, hosted by Josh.

Ten short lessons on what a market is, how to read a chart, and how to accept risk before you enter. Education only — no signals and no promised results.

Pictures of the ideas

Sweep, size, and R — in one pass.

Three teaching diagrams for the setups and math this lab uses. They are illustrations, not market data and not results.

A liquidity sweep, then a reclaim — illustrative only
Liquidity sweep and reclaim An illustrative path runs up to a level of equal highs, wicks through it, then closes back below the level. Labels mark the sweep, the reclaim, and a stop beyond the wick. No prices and not a trade. Equal highs / liquidity 1. Sweep 2. Reclaim Stop Illustrative shape only. Not a trade, not a result, not a signal.
Size is the output of risk and stop distance
Risk first, then size The formula Size equals account equity times risk percent, divided by loss per unit at the stop. Three boxes show accepted dollar risk, stop distance, and position size as the output. No dollar amounts. Size = (equity × risk %) ÷ loss per unit at the stop A picture of the relationship, not a recommendation or a result. Accepted dollar risk Stop distance Position size ÷ = Equity × risk % is the dollar risk you accept first. Divide by the loss per unit at the stop. Size is the output.
Results measured in R, the risk you accepted
Outcomes in R Three bars labeled minus 1R, plus 1R, and plus 2R, showing size relative to the accepted risk. No dollar amounts and no win rates. −1R +1R +2R 1R is the risk you accepted before entry. These bars are a picture, not results.

01 / The system

Build the process. Expose the assumptions.

Lab / Systems →
Five frosted-glass lab vessels linked by ice-blue and teal tubes, with small beads moving between them.
Available

Risk before execution

Interactive position-size and risk/reward calculators, a shared rules framework, and a curriculum that treats losing trades as part of the process.

Try the position-size calculator →
Research hypotheses · untested

Rules before conviction

8 written playbooks with explicit entries, exits, invalidation and limits. A written rule is not evidence of an edge.

Read the playbooks →
Proposed · not connected

AI as a research assistant

A design for source-linked summaries, contradiction checks and journal review. Human verification and risk decisions remain mandatory.

See the proposed AI layer →

02 / Membership

The open lab is the proof layer.

Planned membership goes deeper into the reasoning: the playbook as it is built rule by rule, and the full series of outcomes, losses included—not trade signals.

Josh, in a black cap and blue visor, waving from a bright ice-blue doorway.

Available · free

Open

The public proof and education layer.

  • 10 learning lessons and risk calculators
  • Four explicitly untested playbooks
  • Systems documentation and public lab notes
Explore the open lab

Planned · not available

Member

The proposed deeper context layer.

  • A full journal with decision context
  • Post-mortems with costs and mistakes
  • System documentation and moderated community
Read the membership plan

Planned · not available

Inner Lab

A proposed closer look at the research process.

  • Deeper system walkthroughs
  • Research review and process discussion
  • Scope and access still to be defined
See what is still pending

Membership is the planned main product, not an offer currently for sale. No pricing or opening date is confirmed. Applications, payments and accounts are off. No signals, trade copying or promised returns at any tier.

03 / Journey

An implementation record.
Not a highlight reel.

Document what exists, what remains a design, and what failed to meet the publication standard. The first notes describe this site’s real infrastructure; they do not invent a trading history.

Read the lab notes
Josh writing in a small blank notebook, keeping lab notes.

Build note / November 6, 2026

A public lab without a pretend track record

Static publishing, browser-local lesson progress and deliberate gates on accounts, applications and results. What is implemented, what is not, and why the distinction matters.

Read the implementation note →

04 / Digital-era research

Study the market beneath the chart.

A crypto research agenda for on-chain flows, leverage, liquidity and market structure. Start with a question, document the data limits, and never treat a wallet transfer as a trade signal.

01 On-chain flows ≠ investor intent

02 Open interest ≠ directional conviction

03 Displayed liquidity ≠ guaranteed fills

Frameworks and questions only. No live feeds, findings or alpha claims.

Open the research agenda
Translucent glass cubes linked by thin teal filaments, an abstract picture of an on-chain network with no labels.

05 / Publication contract

The numbers have to earn their place.

An open blank grid notebook and a pen, ready for an honest record with nothing filled in.

Returns net of deposits

Separate contributions and withdrawals from investment results. Define the return method, period and costs before publishing.

Losses stay on the board

Keep mistakes, losing trades and failed hypotheses alongside favorable outcomes. Label backtest, paper and live separately.

Results in R

Report outcomes against initial planned risk, including fees and slippage. Show sample size, drawdown and limitations.

These are publication requirements, not claims about existing results. There is no verified performance record here yet. Read the complete methodology.

From the founder

I don't trade to be right.

I'm Josh Ratigan. My job isn't to be right about the market. It's to execute a process — an edge I'm still testing — and then report what actually happened, losses included.

Consistency, for me, doesn't come from calling direction. It comes from accepting the risk in full before I click, so that no single result can shake me off the plan. The fuller story, including the life behind it, will be told in Josh's own words.

Join the lab list

Occasional notes about this public lab — new pages and implementation notes. Not signals, not a membership account, and not an application.

Education only, not financial advice. This is a personal record of one trader’s decisions, including the mistakes. Trading crypto carries a real risk of losing money. Full disclaimer.